Citrix Consulting – Should you isolate the PVS Streaming traffic or not.
Hi All
I wanna share this great article with you that Nick Rintalan from Citrix Consulting have wrote.
Nick have wrote multiple articles about Citrix Provisioning Services if you should virtulize PVS or not.
I really enjoy Nick’s article and that he shares he’s knowledge from the field. If you are working with Citrix Provisioning Services and you havent read any of Nicks articles before then go ahead and jump in. Its a must read about PVS.
Here is some of Nicks important quote from his article: (Read the full article to get a better understanding)
- if you are running a 10 Gb network, you will have a hard time saturating your network with PVS unless you are doing thousands and thousands of streams! And I’ve seen a lot of production PVS implementations…we only have a few customers that fall into this category.
- Other folks might say to segment the PVS traffic to alleviate issues related to PXE, DHCP or TFTP. With proper network design and manageable broadcast domains, many of the DHCP issues can be mitigated. And I still find many customers and partners don’t know about our swiss army knife – BDM! Instead of dealing with “fun” PXE traffic and trying desperately to load balance TFTP, simply boot from an ISO with BDM and you’ll eliminate a lot of the networking complexity associated with PVS deployments.
- separating PVS streaming traffic is no longer a best practice for the vast majority of our deployments.
- it might make sense –security. The separation of traffic (whether it’s at the VLAN level or physical) reduces the possibility of someone getting into that precious streaming traffic and messing with i
Source
Read the article – Is Isolating the PVS Streaming Traffic Really a Best Practise here.

Dan
| #
Hi Thomas,
Some features in your screenshots (eg create appointments and contacts) seem to be missing from the iOS version of @WorkMail that got released in April, do you know if these features are still coming in a future release? The Android client is far more functional by comparison.
Regards
Dan
Christian Eilskov
| #
You can see the DHCP options here:
http://www.wyse.com/kb and search for 21501
You can transfer a image using Wyse Device Manager(WDM), the same goes for smaller updates like new ICA client and so.
Thomas Poppelgaard
| #
Thank you Barry =)
The deep compression codec for Citrix XenDesktop HDX 3D Pro will be intergrated for Citrix XenApp in Excalibur so there is a big difference with bandwidth consumption. This means that XenApp in Excalibur will be the best platform for user density and works great over WAN with high latency as HDX 3D Pro have been known to deliver for several years. Yes i know of cases with WAN optimization, I will gather these and share them.
Best regards
Thomas
Barry Schiffer
| #
Hi Thomas,
Nice work! Awesome to see these results on XenApp! Is there any noticable difference between XA 6.5 and Excalibur that you are aware of? Do you have experience with WAN Optimization and how this helps to reduce bandwidth further?
Kind regards,
Barry
Thomas Poppelgaard
| #
Hi Matti
i use 311.35
get the latest from http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us